It could be argued that a nuclear war does not exist as possibility as does not exist between the great dying powers. The conflict possibilities could be in the northeast of Asia, in sub-Sahara Africa or in the belt of it breaks euroasatico, everything turning in this last on the crisis Palestinian-Israeli, the Iranian nuclear race and in smaller case conflict of Lebanon. In the northeast of Asia it is evident that we talked about to the Korean conflict and in smaller degree to the permanent Chinese reclamation on several islands under Japanese dominion and not solved problem between China and Russia on the Kuriles islands. The Chinese reclamation on Taiwan we create will be solved by the route of the dialogue. In Sub-Sahara Africa there is a potential for located wars. Thence it operates To the Qaeda and the listing of nonviable States is long, as well as the one of conflicts that have extended therefore time that we can well speak of chronic diseases. It is obvious that the problems exceed to geopolitics, like the drug trafficking, the terrorism, the climatic change or the still burbujeante economic crisis, but we have insisted on which in the world in transition the old woman conceptions of power must be taken into account.

There are geopolitical global problems including in the determination of zones where the extreme poverty leads to political instability. The recent events of Tunisia – still inmedibles in its possible contagion they make ask us to us on destiny of " theocracy of poder". In Latin America some border problems of long data do not seem worrisome as far as warlike confrontations that we know inclusively if they explode last very little. In terms of duration the Bolivian reclamation from an exit to the sea does not indicate, including by Bolivian leanness, the possibility of armed conflict.